<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nutso Supreme</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philosophy-101.com/2008/01/18/nutso-supreme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philosophy-101.com/2008/01/18/nutso-supreme/</link>
	<description>Freedom, Reason, Individualism, Laissez-Faire Capitalism.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 14:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike N</title>
		<link>http://www.philosophy-101.com/2008/01/18/nutso-supreme/#comment-1684</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosophy-101.com/2008/01/18/nutso-supreme/#comment-1684</guid>
		<description>I've wondered how people who deal in beliefs rather than knowledge, can call someone else's beliefs irrational. They are irrational according to what standard? Such questions usually boil down to subjectivism: what set of beliefs does one personally prefer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve wondered how people who deal in beliefs rather than knowledge, can call someone else&#8217;s beliefs irrational. They are irrational according to what standard? Such questions usually boil down to subjectivism: what set of beliefs does one personally prefer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.393 seconds -->
