<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Earth Day Nonsense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.philosophy-101.com/2008/04/25/earth-day-nonsense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.philosophy-101.com/2008/04/25/earth-day-nonsense/</link>
	<description>Achieving Success and Happiness through Philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:24:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.philosophy-101.com/2008/04/25/earth-day-nonsense/comment-page-1/#comment-2206</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosophy-101.com/?p=129#comment-2206</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with your opinion concerning most of these groups. most started out with a noble idea, then everything just spun out control. So, I say &quot;no&quot; to all of these hippy outfits. No to animal rights, yes to beef and the other stuff they stand for. I do believe in the &quot;organic&quot; movement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with your opinion concerning most of these groups. most started out with a noble idea, then everything just spun out control. So, I say &#8220;no&#8221; to all of these hippy outfits. No to animal rights, yes to beef and the other stuff they stand for. I do believe in the &#8220;organic&#8221; movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.philosophy-101.com/2008/04/25/earth-day-nonsense/comment-page-1/#comment-1700</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 18:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.philosophy-101.com/?p=129#comment-1700</guid>
		<description>Regarding the &quot;hypocrisy&quot;– First of all, to say &quot;an all out war on capitalism&quot; has been waged is, generally speaking, an over exaggeration. That aside, if capitalism is the system which is enabling the technological innovation and progress to deal with the environmental problems which are caused by capitalism in the first place...
Well, you do the math. Remove capitalism from the equation and you no longer need the technology. Of course you no longer need  the environmentalists then do you? 

Back to the beginning of the article where we speak of environmental alarmists, –the &quot;doomsdayers&quot; Indeed we have made great &quot;progress&quot;. But we must look at how we define progress. We are, it can be argued, causing less damage than we were in the 70&#039;s. That is not to say however that we are causing no damage, or less damage is acceptable. If, everyday when you came home from work you found that your dog,( yes your dog ) had defecated all over the living room carpet. You would likely say &quot;bad dog&quot; indeed. Then after years of correcting and training, you came home only to find that said dog was only crapping on a few areas of the rug... could you really muster the enthusiasm to say &quot;good dog&quot; Still a bad dog, just less bad.
And what if we didn&#039;t have the doomsdayers proclaiming the end of the world if we don&#039;t correct our behavior? 
Consider where we might be, what kind of world we might be living in if we didn&#039;t have these folks screaming about the future?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the &#8220;hypocrisy&#8221;– First of all, to say &#8220;an all out war on capitalism&#8221; has been waged is, generally speaking, an over exaggeration. That aside, if capitalism is the system which is enabling the technological innovation and progress to deal with the environmental problems which are caused by capitalism in the first place&#8230;<br />
Well, you do the math. Remove capitalism from the equation and you no longer need the technology. Of course you no longer need  the environmentalists then do you? </p>
<p>Back to the beginning of the article where we speak of environmental alarmists, –the &#8220;doomsdayers&#8221; Indeed we have made great &#8220;progress&#8221;. But we must look at how we define progress. We are, it can be argued, causing less damage than we were in the 70&#8242;s. That is not to say however that we are causing no damage, or less damage is acceptable. If, everyday when you came home from work you found that your dog,( yes your dog ) had defecated all over the living room carpet. You would likely say &#8220;bad dog&#8221; indeed. Then after years of correcting and training, you came home only to find that said dog was only crapping on a few areas of the rug&#8230; could you really muster the enthusiasm to say &#8220;good dog&#8221; Still a bad dog, just less bad.<br />
And what if we didn&#8217;t have the doomsdayers proclaiming the end of the world if we don&#8217;t correct our behavior?<br />
Consider where we might be, what kind of world we might be living in if we didn&#8217;t have these folks screaming about the future?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
