Basic Principles of Objectivism course now available for download

Posted by Anja on November 27th, 2009

The Culture of Reason Center is offering lectures 1-20 of Nathaniel Branden’s The Basic Principles of Objectivism Course for sale as individual MP3 downloads. These are the original lectures that Branden gave during the operation of the Nathaniel Branden Institute in the 60’s. Enjoy!

Basic_Principles_Lecture_1cropLecture 01: The Role of Philosophy
Lecture 02: What is Reason?
Lecture 03: Logic and Mysticism
Lecture 04: The Concept of God
Lecture 05: Free Will
Lecture 06: Efficient Thinking
Lecture 07: Self-Esteem
Lecture 08: The Psychology of Dependence
Lecture 09: The Psychology of Sex
Lecture 10: The Objectivist Ethics
Lecture 11: Reason and Virtue
Lecture 12: Justice vs. Mercy
Lecture 13: The Evil of Self-Sacrifice
Lecture 14: Government and The Individual
Lecture 15: The Economics of A Free Society
Lecture 16: Common Fallacies About Capitalism
Lecture 17: Romanticism, Naturalism and The Novels of Ayn Rand, Part 1
Lecture 18: Romanticism, Naturalism and The Novels of Ayn Rand, Part 2
Lecture 19: The Nature of Evil
Lecture 20: The Benevolent Sense of Life

Enjoying Fiction

Posted by Anja on June 17th, 2008

Ask A Philosopher has received its first question. Yeah!:

I enjoy reading novels, but I have often wondered, what is the purpose of reading fiction? Yes, in general it is because it gives people enjoyment, but why?

This is a great question and I do have some general thoughts that might be helpful in answering it.
Read the rest of this entry »

Will the real Perp please stand up!

Posted by Anja on April 20th, 2008

During his recent visit to the States, Pope Benedict XVI addressed the priest sex scandal of the U.S. Catholic Church and pointed out that the moral breakdown of society is at least partly to blame. Pedophilia, he argued, is a symptom of overall decrepit sexual mores.

Indeed, it is not as though the moral code of the Catholic Church, especially pertaining to priests and sex, is just impossible to practice because it fundamentally goes against human nature.

Drug Prohibition is Immoral

Posted by Anja on March 6th, 2008

Jacob Sullum reports on the Atlasphere that:

The Bureau of Justice Statistics reports that drug offenders account for about 25 percent of local jail inmates, 21 percent of state prisoners and 55 percent of federal prisoners. Since 1980 the number of drug offenders in state prisons has increased by 1,200 percent, more than four times the increase in violent offenders. … According to the U.S. Sentencing Commission, however, only one in ten federal crack offenses involves violence or the threat of violence. … Research conducted by criminologist John DiIulio, economist Anne Morrison Piehl, and sociologist Bert Useem in the late 1990s found that many, if not most, people sentenced for drug crimes in New York, Arizona, and New Mexico were “drug-only offenders,” meaning the only crimes they’d ever committed involved the voluntary exchange of politically incorrect intoxicants for money.

Read the rest of this entry »

His and Her Brain

Posted by Anja on September 18th, 2007

It has been revealed, the male brain! I am particularly astonished by the size of the toilet aiming cell and the listening particle. Are they really that big? And why are there two separate areas for sex? For comparison, here is the female brain. It is interesting that the need for commitment hemisphere and the shopping area are so close together while indecision area is far removed from the shopping area. I suppose more scientific data will confirm or disconfirm those precise locations. And where is the nagging realm?

Who said reading Philosophy is boring?

Posted by Anja on August 14th, 2007

I don’t. And in case you are trying to skip those dreaded footnotes, think again. You may be missing out. Sigmund Freud’s Civilization and its Discontents contains some of the most hilarious footnotes of all time. To sample, here is one on the control of fire.

“If we go back far enough, we find that the first acts of civilization were the use of tools, the gaining of control over fire, and the construction of dwellings. Among these, the control of fire stands out as a quite extraordinary and unexampled achievement…. Psycho-analytic material, incomplete as it is and not susceptible to clear interpretation, nevertheless admits of a conjecture – a fantastic-sounding one – about the origins of this human feat. It is as though primal man had the habit, when he came into contact with fire, of satisfying the infantile desire connected with it, by putting it out with a stream of his urine. The legends that we possess leave no doubt about the originally phallic view taken of tongues of flame as they shoot upward. Putting out the fire by micturating – a theme to which modern giants, Gulliver in Lilliput and Rabelais’ Gargantua, still hark back – was therefore a kind of sexual act with a male, an enjoyment of sexual potency in a homosexual competition. The first person to renounce this desire and spare the fire was able to carry it off with him and subdue it to his own use. By damping down the fire of his own sexual excitation, he had tamed the natural force of fire. This great cultural conquest was thus the reward for his renunciation of instinct. Further, it is as though woman had been appointed guardian of the fire which was held captive on the domestic hearth, because her anatomy made it impossible for her to yield to the temptation of this desire.” (Sigmund Freud, Civilization and its Discontents, translated by James Strachey, Norton: 1930/1984, p. 42-43)

I have to go now. I think my guy friends are trying to put out the fire in my fireplace again. Damn primal urges!


© 2008 Philosophy 101
Designed by Lorelei for Web Hosting | Coded by Cheap Web Hosting and Web Site Hosting
FireStats icon Powered by FireStats